|
1
|
- John P. Beasley, Jr.
- Professor and Extension Peanut Agronomist
- Crop and Soil Sciences Department
- University of Georgia
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- SE (GA, AL, FL, MS)
- 1,137,998 acres (70.1%)
- w/i SE – GA = 66%, AL = 19.1%, FL = 13.6%, MS = 1.2%
- SW (TX, OK, NM)
- VC (NC, SC, VA)
- Other (LA, AR, KS, MN, AZ, ID)
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Mixed reports ranging from good to pretty bad with little in between
- Acreage down to about 23,000 and anticipating another decrease in 2006
- Disease pressure seemed minimal for many producers
- – conditions were not favorable
for sclerotinia (which can significantly impact input costs).
- Hope to average 3,000, but tough to get a handle with wide range of
yields
- Year was driven completely by moisture – situation of “haves” and “have
nots”
|
|
8
|
- Rain in late Oct slowed harvest, followed by cooler and drier weather
which aided harvest
- Major issue with Seg 2 loads due to excessive cloudy/wet weather and
above normal temps
- Most Seg 2’s were those dug and allowed to air dry in early Oct
- Those peanuts stayed on the ground upwards of 3 weeks under cloudy and
warm conditions
- Some growers had 100% Seg 2, while others were 30-60%
|
|
9
|
- Counties in extreme northeastern NC were most affected with Seg 2
problems
- There was a smattering of the Seg 2 problem over the entire NC and VA
area
- Hull brightness has also been a problem
- Yields are in the 3,000 lbs/A range
- Quality for the in-shell market has deteriorated over the past few weeks
|
|
10
|
- Yield and grade significantly down from previous two years
- Sept drought reduced yield on some dryland acreage but major yield loss
factor was 8 days of rain and drizzle in heart of Oct harvest
- A lot of virginia-type crop stayed in ground too long resulting in some
severe pod loss
- Oct weather system was a “double whammy” – some of the fields dug before
the rain hit went Seg 2
- Peanuts on top of ground were in a warm mist chamber for 8 straight days
(mold and sprouting)
|
|
11
|
- Major economic disease factors were TSWV and white mold (southern stem
rot)
- White mold was a contributing factor in pod losses where peanuts stayed
in ground too long
- Excellent yields and grades, even on dryland, where gotten out of field
on time (most growers had at least part of their crop affected by the
week of unusual weather in Oct
- Summary – great crop going into Sept, a good crop going into Oct, and a
below average crop by the end of Oct
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- We have a strong crop, probably over 90% complete
- Warm fall was a plus, except often had to water to dig
- Had frost out west last week of Oct – no problems reported
- Maturity looked way ahead of normal – should be good grades
- Disease pressure was moderate
|
|
14
|
- Crop still coming out in Texas (as of Nov 3)
- It has been a slow process due to
- peanuts taking a long time to
finish out
- wet weather early in the harvest season
- growers trying to field dry so as not to have to pay high drying costs
- Crop prospects still look good for the most part
- No major disease problems to speak of
- Growers most concerned about current and future price and supply
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Lot of new growers
- Expansion of acres (2X) by second and third year growers
- There is big interest in continued peanut production in Mississippi
- New ground with good yields in 2004 & 2005
- Expect more expansion in Delta (north of Vicksburg) following cotton
|
|
17
|
- Yields in Florida will be down from historical averages
- Tentative yield projections from county agents
- Jackson County – 2,500
- Santa Rosa County– down 500-700 from 3,300 avg
- Levy County – down, but not sure how much
- Overall, this year below 2004
- Some very good fields and some very poor ones
- Bottom line – yields average to below average with heavy spotted wilt
virus
|
|
18
|
- Crop has been spotty
- Sandy ridges with good rotation and good disease control produced good
peanuts
- Much of the heavier, poorly drained soils did not produce a good crop
- Grades were lower than growers expected
- Wet summer (11 inches in June) didn’t leave many days to spray for
diseases, therefore, growers were behind before they got started (it is
hard to play catch up on disease control)
|
|
19
|
- Summer was wet but harvest months of Sept and Oct were dry and drier
- As harvest season lengthened, peanuts became more difficult to harvest
and field losses increased
- In past years, crop was harvested at a moisture content between 13 and
18%. With few exceptions, this year the crop was harvested at 10-12%
- This affected quality and will result in abundant splits in the shelling
plants
|
|
20
|
- Yield potential between 2,700 and 2,900 lbs/A
- Worse year for tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) since 1998 or 1999 (we
can’t explain why)
- Three-cornered alfalfa hopper damage was more severe than we realized.
Had a major impact on yield potential but we are unable to determine how
much
- White mold pressure was heavy in many fields
- When it turned dry in Sept, WM moved underground onto pods
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Why the low grades early in the harvest?
- My theory is that the drought hit when a significant portion of many
fields had immature pods (high in moisture content) that shriveled when
they dried before grading
- Florida beggarweed and Palmer amaranth were major problems for some
producers
- Weed scientists in SE concerned as glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth
was found in Georgia in 2005
- We MUST reduce acreage in 2006 to improve rotation sequence and reduce
disease pressure
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|